Mojtaba Mokhber Dezfuli; Omid Mosafaeii Rad; Fariba Ghorbani; Behrooz Farzanegan; Elham Mir-Moeini; Mohammad Behgam Shadmehr
Volume 24, Issue 7 , 2022
Abstract
Background: Making decisions and planning about tracheostomy is not clear yet.
Objectives: This study aimed to report intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, and tracheostomy rates among patients in different settings and compare the outcomes of surgical and Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy ...
Read More
Background: Making decisions and planning about tracheostomy is not clear yet.
Objectives: This study aimed to report intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, and tracheostomy rates among patients in different settings and compare the outcomes of surgical and Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) techniques between COVID-19 and non-COVID patients.
Methods: Patients admitted to Masih Daneshvary hospital were assessed from February 2020 to May 2021 for intubation and tracheostomy rates. Different aspects and outcomes of two methods of tracheostomy, including surgical and PDT tracheostomy, were compared. Among non-COVID patients, 15 ICU admitted patients with different etiologies of pneumonia who required mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy were randomly selected and compared to COVID-19 patients.
Results: A total of 7,748 COVID-19 patients were admitted, with 12.7% admitted to ICU with an intubation rate of 5.13%. Tracheostomy was performed for a total of 36 patients (0.46%) for prolonged intubation with a trend of 0.1% to 1.45% in 16 months. Regarding the technique of tracheostomy, 24% and 33.3% of patients survived in surgical and PDT groups, respectively (P=0.44). Surgical tracheostomy and PDT were performed in 26.5% and 40% of non-COVID patients, respectively (P=0.5). The mortality rate was 72.2% and 20% in the surgical tracheostomy and PDT groups, respectively (P=0.003).
Conclusion: Given the study results, both surgical and percutaneous techniques are feasible for COVID-19 patients, and the decision about the optimal timing of intubation needs more inquiry.
Roya Farzanegan; Maryam Alehashem; Behrooz Farzanegan; Sharareh R Niakan Kalhori; Mohammad Gholami Fesharaki; Farshid Rahimi Bashar; Behjat Barari; Mahdi Zangi; Mohammad Behgam Shadmehr
Volume 19, Issue 1 , January 2017, , Pages 1-11
Abstract
Background: Tracheal stenosis is one of the worst complications of endotracheal intubation, but timely diagnosis can change its natural history. Management of these patients places a great burden on the health care system and the well-being of the patients and their families. Therefore, discharged intensive-care-unit ...
Read More
Background: Tracheal stenosis is one of the worst complications of endotracheal intubation, but timely diagnosis can change its natural history. Management of these patients places a great burden on the health care system and the well-being of the patients and their families. Therefore, discharged intensive-care-unit (ICU) patients who underwent more than 24 hours of intubation should be actively followed-up 3 months after extubation and screened for post-intubation tracheal stenosis. The present study was aimed at assessing the impact of post-discharge follow-up call interviews on increasing successful screening for post-intubation tracheal stenosis.Objectives: To determine the effect of post-discharge call interviews on improving screening of post-intubation tracheal stenosis.Methods: This experimental study was conducted in Iran in September 2014. Using the simple randomization method, 140 patients who had undergone than 24 hours of endotracheal intubation and had received oral and written educational materials upon discharge from the ICU were equally assigned to an intervention and a control groups (received a call interview before or after the follow-up due date, respectively). The needed sample size was calculated to be 70 participants in each group (considering α = 5%, the statistical power of 90%, and effect size = 0.4).Results: There was a significant difference in follow-up rates at the due date between the intervention group (50.7%, 34of 67 participants) and the control group (17.5%, 11 of 63 participants) (OR = 4.871, 95% CI = 2.172 to 10.924, P < 0.0001). In the control group, the call interviews significantly increased the follow-up rate from 17.5% to 66.7 % (42 of 63 participants) (P < 0.0001), although followup occurred after the due date. The results of the logistic regression model showed that the patients who had attempted suicide completed follow-up more than those who had not (P = 0.017), that interviews with patients and their parents were more effect than interviews with others (P < 0.05), and that phone call interviews after the follow-up due date were more effective than those before the follow-up due date (OR = 2.653, 95%CI = 1.079 to 6.526, P = 0.034).Conclusions: We highly recommend making call interviews, along with distributing the oral and written educational materials, to increase the follow-up rate among discharged ICU patients.
